Iraq Needs Its No-Bid Oil Contracts Deals aren't exploitative, argues energy adviser By Kevin Spak Posted Jul 26, 2008 3:15 PM CDT Copied Employees work at an installation at the Zubair Moshrif oil field, 600 kilometers (372 miles) southeast of Baghdad, Iraq, Thursday, July 3, 2008. (AP Photo) US lawmakers have been raging against no-bid deals struck by foreign oil companies in Iraq—but impeding them would be pure folly, energy consultant Raad Alkadiri argues in the Washington Post. Most of these companies have already advised Iraq on its oil fields for free; Baghdad only sought to formalize the business with contracts, which aren't cupcake deals, either. Iraq is fighting hard for its national interests, and US intervention would not be looked on kindly. "Obstructing the deals simultaneously conveys to Iraqis the image of direct U.S. interference in their sovereign affairs and the impression that America is somehow seeking to impede their country's recovery," Alkadiri writes. Read These Next A White House press briefing got pretty heated Thursday. Liam Neeson's reps have some PR spin to do over an anti-vax film. Texas is confronting an invasive Australian pest. Audi Crooks of Iowa State may do what no college player has ever done. Report an error