A federal judge Friday refused to bar a group from monitoring outdoor ballot boxes in Arizona's largest county, where watchers have shown up armed and in ballistic vests, saying to do so could violate the monitors' constitutional rights. US District Court Judge Michael Liburdi said the case remained open, and that the Arizona Alliance for Retired Americans could try again to make its argument against a group calling itself Clean Elections USA. A second plaintiff, Voto Latino, was removed from the case. Liburdi concluded that "while this case certainly presents serious questions, the Court cannot craft an injunction without violating the First Amendment," per the AP. The judge is a Trump appointee and a member of the Federalist Society, a conservative legal organization.
Local and federal law enforcement have been alarmed by reports of people, including some who were masked and armed, watching 24-hour ballot boxes in Maricopa County—Arizona's most populous county—and rural Yavapai County as midterm elections near. Some voters have alleged voter intimidation after people watching the boxes took photos and videos and followed voters. Arizona law states electioneers and monitors must remain 75 feet away from a voting location. "Plaintiffs have not provided the Court with any evidence that Defendants' conduct constitutes a true threat," the judge wrote. Liburdi issued his ruling two days after a hearing on the first of two similar cases. The attorney for Clean Elections USA had argued that such a broad restraining order would be unconstitutional.
Sheriff's deputies are providing security around the two outdoor drop boxes in Maricopa County after a pair of people carrying guns and wearing bulletproof vests showed up at a box in the Phoenix suburb of Mesa. The county's other 24-hour outdoor drop box is at the Maricopa County Tabulation and Election Center in downtown Phoenix, which is now surrounded by a chain-link fence. Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich, a Republican, has called on voters to immediately report any intimidation to police and file a complaint with his office. The AARA said it was disappointed with Liburdi's ruling. "We continue to believe that Clean Elections USA's intimidation and harassment is unlawful," it said, shortly before filing an appeal.
(More
Arizona stories.)
,
uBlock 
,
and
Ghostery 
)
